Admit it. You need me. We’re connected!
Admit it. You need me. We’re connected!
Hey, about your “supermoon” post. First off, the 2005 tsunami was not caused by a “supermoon”. It was just a regular full moon, and we don’t see tsunamis and hurricanes every full moon. Also, you can’t say “around the same time” when you specified 2005. There are 12-13 full moons a year, and that wouldn’t be at all connected. Second, that article contradicts itself, by saying “closest approach in 20 years” and “last supermoon was in 2005.” And they’re like three sentences from each other. Third, keyword being “astrologers.” Astrology, be definition, is a pseudoscience, literally “fake-science” Though this does have slightly more science to support it (apparently one of them figured out the moon causes tides), it still isn’t much. Though it will be a little closer than usual, a law of physics called the inverse square law says that if you double the distance between two objects, the gravitational influence increases by four times. Considering it’ll be coming something like 10% or less closer than usual, that still isn’t much of an effect. The biggest reaction we might see is a bit higher tides than usual. I don’t mean to attack you, I just know that you have a whole lot of followers, and if they interpret that post as “THE MOON SHALT DESTROYIFY THE EARTH ON THE 19TH” they will tell people who will tell people who will tell people, and soon you have a lot of misinformed, terrified people in bunkers (Y2K?).
...Read More & Comments »
well how’d you get it? is it connected to his twitter?
His tumblr gets alot of q’s so he made a formspring to anwser questions
and i just searched it
...Read More & Comments »
well how’d you get it? is it connected to his twitter?
His tumblr gets alot of q’s so he made a formspring to anwser questions
and i just searched it
...Read More & Comments »
I think you need more than 4 points to make your argument stronger. More points with more details. Citations are the basis to a strong argument, so use them. Right now, I’m not convinced that Twilight is at all related to the Bible. (And because Stepenie Meyer is a Mormon, wouldn’t she have related her story to “The Book of Mormon?”) Anybody can find the tiniest sign and make it seem connected with to something completely different. It’s based on a psychological effect called ‘Forer Effect’. Could you answer these questions for me? `If Twilight was first printed in 2005 and Harry Potter was printed in 1997, with the “Prisoner of Azkaban” being (the book that introduces Sirius Black) printed in 1999, how could Harry Potter possibly have copied Twilight? (By the way, Taylor Lautner isn’t black either and unfortunately, that weakens your point.) And if Twilight supposedly copies the Bible, it can be argued that Harry Potter copied the Bible as well. `Most of your points are based on opinions. Do you have any scientific or statistical data to show for it? ` You’re just trolling, aren’t you? And laughing at the effort put into this message? If you are, can you at least not drag the Lord into this? That just crosses the line. Thanks!
Jesus called, he said shut up.
Christ be with you.
